![]() The British campaign takes place in Northern Africa and you’re told to destroy German planes. ![]() The Norwegian campaign is about destroying a heavy water plant that was actually destroyed by a British Commando team not a women and her daughter. Battlefield 5’s campaign is made of a selection of short stories called War Stories that are all fiction and unlike Battlefield 1’s War Stories, Battlefield 5’s aren’t really based on anything. Not only does this campaign get rid of historical facts in the name of diversity it’s just bad overall to the point where I didn’t even have fun playing it. Peter Muller one of the main characters from the campaign. Overall Battlefield 5 has a pretty good multiplayer but its want of diversity where there was none and the removal of Swastikas to not offend anyone does make it loose some points.Ĭampaign. They also have Africans fighting for Germany which Germany would never allow unlike the US and UK. This would be fine if it was a modern war, future war, or had just added the Eastern Front with the USSR. For example Battlefield 5 has women on the US, UK, Japan, and Germany all of which didn’t have women fight as front line soldiers. I am fine with some historically inaccurate skins in multiplayer but there are exceptions. The other historical inaccuracy is the customization. Removing the Swastika because it might offend people makes people forget what the Nazis did, like the Holocaust. The problem is that Germany was easily the bad guy along with Japan in World War 2. This makes the Germans seem like just another country invading another country with you just fighting for Germany. None, the Swastika is replaced by the Iron Cross. There are historical inaccuracies as well for example: there are no Swastikas in this game. Again only a minor problem but a problem nonetheless. The only time this can be a problem is that it is a World War 2 game and should show some horror but only Devastation comes close to doing this. Mercury, Pacific Storm, and Devastation look fantastic and most of the other maps do to. A plus and con to the maps are that they look really good. Battlefield 5’s maps are pretty good whether storming the beaches of Iwo Jima or driving a tank through the fields of France Battlefield 5’s maps are fun to play on. (Two years later COD BO Cold War would release with 8 maps which were smaller than Battlefield 5’s.) Thanks to updates there are now 21 maps including the Pacific theater and the Western Front. When Battlefield 5 first launched there were eight maps a low number at the time. This creates the need to not always be running and gunning but still doesn’t grind the game to a halt because you ran out of bandages. ![]() The use of manual health is very well done with the ability to heal completely if using bandages but healing slightly overtime. The gameplay is pretty good especially sniping. Typically I would review the campaign first but nearly no one if anyone plays Battlefield for the campaign. Unlike its cousin Star Wars Battlefront 2, Battlefield 5 didn’t make as big as a comeback but did slightly redeem itself. Battlefield 5 is a game racked with controversy mostly from the reveal, which was so awful in presentation and because it made World War 2 look ridiculous. ![]() On the other hand it might do very well if your game looks good and keeps what people liked about the reveal. I like this loading screen but does this guy have two right hands or is it just me?įirst impressions are important for a game, if your game looks bad it might not do well.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |